The Future of NASA
Michael Griffin is gearin...
More Features
Looking to apply for a Discover Credit Card? Members/Subscribers Log In      
Farewell
My Problem with Big Pharma
Has Newsweek Sold Out to Big Pharma?
Dark Side of Green, Continued
The Dark Side of Green
The Green Bandwagon
Green Book Award: Nominations Wanted
Wilson Wins “Green Book Award”
The End of Total War?
Does the Desire for Peace Cause War?
[ Full Blog Archives ]
[ Who is John Horgan? ]
[ What is Horganism? ]
Mind & Brain
Medicine
Space
Technology
Ancient Life
Environment
All Newsletters
   
Discover Magazine  Blog  Archives
Horganism

« Are Scientists More Likely to Have Autistic Kids? | Main | How Smart Are Other Animals, Really? »



SLACer Whacks Pluckers

It’s not just renegade physicists like Lee Smolin and Peter Woit and obnoxious journalists like me who are whacking pluckers these days. In this month’s Physics Today, Burton Richter, former director of the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), blasts string and related pseudoscientific ideas , namely the anthropic principle (the universe must be the way it is because otherwise we wouldn’t be here to observe it) and landscape theory (all of the infinite universes permitted by string theory actually exist).

In “Theory in Particle Physics: Theological Speculation Versus Practical Knowledge” (forwarded to me by a Stevens colleague and friend, the physicist Ed Whittaker), Richter charges that pluckers have “gone off into a kind of metaphysical wonderland. Simply put, much of what currently passes as the most advanced theory looks to be more theological speculation, the development of models with no testable consequences, than it is the development of practical knowledge.”

What makes this doubly delicious is that Richter’s broadside is clearly aimed at his Stanford colleague Leonard Susskind, a leading plucker, landscaper and anthropic advocate. I wish I could have seen Susskind’s face when he read Richter’s comparison of the anthropic principle to creationism!

I disagree with Richter on one point. Trying not to be entirely negative, he contends that inflation has recently been transformed from untestable theological speculation into something resembling a genuine theory. As I pointed out two posts ago, inflation is based on unproven and probably unprovable physics, and it offers no predictions that cannot be accounted for by more modest big-bang models. That’s why the Nobel Committee for Physics didn’t mention inflation in its recent prize announcement.

Other than that, Burton, you're right on!

Comments

nigel cook

"... inflation is based on unproven and probably unprovable physics, and it offers no predictions that cannot be accounted for by more modest big-bang models."

One way to get rid of inflation and preserve the smoothness of the CBR from 400,000 years after the BB is to simply have an increase in gravitation strength G in direct proportion to time as in mechanistic Yang-Mills quantum gravity: contrary to Teller 1948, this doesn't affect the sun's brightness not indeed fusion rates at 3 mins after the BB.

This is so because the Coulomb force, unified with gravity, has the same time-dependence.

Because the Coulomb force is repulsive between protons and nuclei, the higher repulsion as the universe ages would exactly offset the higher gravitational compression! (Both Coulomb's law and gravity are inverse-square type long range forces.)

Fusion reactions occur when nuclei are compressed enough by gravity that they overcome the Coulomb repulsion and are fused at short range by the strong nuclear force. More info:

http://feynman137.tripod.com/#d
https://nige.wordpress.com/

The comments to this entry are closed.



   
Wishful Seeing
Shiny Happy People
20 Things You Didn't Know About... Sleep
Can New Neurons Teach an Old Mouse?
The Woman Who Never Forgets
Why We Get Diseases Other Primates Don't
Vital Signs: Trouble in the Nursery
Natural Selections: The Potential Pandemic You've Never Heard Of
20 Things You Didn't Know About... Death
Natural Selections: The Potential Pandemic You've Never Heard Of
Recently Covered in Discover: The Man Who Finds Planets
Sky Lights: The Dark Side of the Universe
20 Things You Didn't Know About... Meteors
Sky Lights: The Dark Side of the Universe
Islam Hits International Space Station
Neighborhood Watch Goes High Tech
Going Atomic... Again
Jaron's World: The Murder of Mystery
How to Make Anything Look Like a Toy, Round II
Raw Data: The Rigorous Study of the Ancient Mariners
Will We Ever Clone a Caveman?
This Month's Ask Discover
How Life Got a Leg Up
Mammals Stake Their Place in Jurassic Park
You Say "Ook Ook," I Say "Aak Aak"
Guilt-Free Gossip for Greens
A Greener Faith
Whatever Happened To... the Exxon Valdez?
Life After Oil
The Next Katrina
  Full access to all site content requires registration as a magazine subscriber.
© 2005 Discover Media LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Your California Privacy Rights | Terms and Conditions | Educator's Guide | Subscribe Online Today | Online Media Kit
Customer Care | Contact Us